
January 6th 2009
There is an elephant in the room and I must acknowledge it. So far I have been writing about Buddhism as though there were only one form. This is far from the truth. Buddhism is different in different societies. It has absorbed the beliefs and customs of the cultures it has contacted.
I write from the point of view of a Zen Buddhist, but like most of us, I admire and respect the Tibetan Buddhist Dalai Lama absolutely. I'm told that in Tibet there are many Buddhist sects, not all on good terms with each other, but I think that the Dalai Lama transcends these differences, not only in Tibet but around the world.
Buddhism is also very adaptable. The Dalai Lama has said that if science proved a Buddhist concept to be wrong, Buddhists should respect science and modify their thoughts accordingly, but without losing the deep meaning of Buddhism. Quite unusual. And to me, extraordinarily admirable.'
Well we dragged that pachyderm out, but there's another one behind the couch. This one is in the form of a question: Is Buddhism a religion or a philosophy? For most people it is a religion. For me it is a philosophy, or a guide to living. The reason for this is that for me there is no God keeping an eye on me. I notice that many American Buddhists refer to God as though he were an old white man up in the clouds as they learned in Sunday school. Others believe in a more amorphous force. I am told that it is possible to be both a Buddhist and a Baptist, or any other religion. I could not do this. I don't sense any sort of god at all. But there again, there is an infinity I don't sense.